{"id":15522,"date":"2017-03-21T04:00:26","date_gmt":"2017-03-21T04:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/?p=15522"},"modified":"2023-03-15T12:15:56","modified_gmt":"2023-03-15T12:15:56","slug":"intel-security-new-global-cybersecurity-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/2017\/03\/21\/intel-security-new-global-cybersecurity-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Intel Security : New Global Cybersecurity Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"margin: 0px;color: black;font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\">Intel Security, in partnership with the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), has released \u201cTilting the Playing Field: How Misaligned Incentives Work Against Cybersecurity,\u201d a global report and survey revealing three categories of misaligned incentives: corporate structures versus the free flow of criminal enterprises; strategy versus implementation; and senior executives versus those in implementation roles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"margin: 0px;color: black;font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\">Interviewing 800 global cybersecurity professionals from five industry sectors, the report outlines how cybercriminals have the advantage, thanks to the incentives for cybercrime creating a big business in a fluid and dynamic marketplace. Defenders on the other hand, often operate in bureaucratic hierarchies, making them hard-pressed to keep up.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"margin: 0px;color: black;font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\">Additional misalignments occur within defenders\u2019 organizations. For instance, while more than 90 percent of organizations report having a cybersecurity strategy, less than half have fully implemented them. Moreover, 83 percent say their organizations have been affected by cybersecurity breaches, indicating a disconnect between strategy and implementation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"margin: 0px;color: black;font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\">The survey not only shows there are few incentives for cybersecurity professionals, but that executives are much more confident than operational staff about the effectiveness of the existing incentives. For example, 42 percent of cybersecurity implementers report that no incentives exist, compared to only 18 percent of decision-makers and eight percent of leaders.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"margin: 0px;color: black;font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\">\u201cThe cybercriminal market is primed for success by its very structure, which rapidly rewards innovation and promotes sharing of the best tools,\u201d said Candace Worley, vice president of enterprise solutions for Intel Security. \u201cFor IT and cyber professionals in government and business to compete with attackers, they need to be as nimble and agile as the criminals they seek to apprehend, and provide incentives that IT staff value.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"margin: 0px;color: black;font-family: 'Arial',sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\">The good news, according to the report\u2019s authors, is that most companies recognize the seriousness of the cybersecurity problem and are willing to address it. Organizations need more than tools to combat cyber attackers; experimentation is necessary to determine the right mix of metrics and incentives for each organization as they approach cybersecurity through more than just a cost-conscious framework and become more innovative in their organizational structure and processes.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Intel Security, in partnership with the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), has released \u201cTilting the Playing Field: How Misaligned Incentives Work Against Cybersecurity,\u201d a global report and survey revealing three categories of misaligned incentives: corporate structures versus the free flow of criminal enterprises; strategy versus implementation; and senior executives versus those in implementation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":15744,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,430,6,809,54,791],"tags":[292,138,1350,10],"class_list":["post-15522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-enterprise-security","category-features","category-insights","category-more-news","category-research","category-ksa","tag-cyber-attacks","tag-cyber-security","tag-intel-security","tag-security-2"],"acf":[],"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15522"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15522\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83519,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15522\/revisions\/83519"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligentcio.com\/me\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}